Archive - technology RSS Feed

Need a New Logo? Try a Crowd Sourced Logo!

Does your organization have a logo? Are you tired of the one you currently have? If so, this post should make you smile. It seems that a variety of companies have cropped up recently that are in the logo crowd-sourcing business. Here’s the gist of how they work.
You register with one of these sites and set up a contest with a set monetary prize and a deadline. Designers from all over begin submitting designs based upon the guidelines you’ve set. They then cross their fingers and hope you pick them. Fairly easy concept. The winner wins anywhere from $100 on up, and you get a professional logo for your organization; the perfect win-win.
Here are a few of those companies with a little info:
The contests on this company seem to begin for as little as $100 and go up from there. This particular company started off at the $100 range and has received 66 submissions. Not bad. This is for a startup company called FastPencil. They put up $295 for their contest, and have received 68 entries. The submissions to this company look very professional.
This company seems to be a little bigger, with contests ranging in price from $200 on up. Here’s an example of what you’ll get for $200 for a company called Simply Sweet. They received 229 submissions, and they still have 7 days left in the contest (up to this point). Here are some examples of what $300 will get you.
The price for a logo here costs $200. Here is a company called DriveClean that’s at the $200 level and has received 122 submissions! A friend of mine, Anthony WagenerSmith is using LogoSauce to design the logo for a church plant he just launched called Compass Communities. Here are some of the 51 submissions at the $200 level.
And finally…
Contests begin at $250 here. This one seems to have quite a lot of buzz surrounding it, as it’s been featured in the Washington Post, PC World, Killer Startups, and others. I first heard about this one through a tweet I saw from Michael Hyatt, CEO of Thomas Nelson Publishing. Here’s the contest he started at $250 (for a logo for his personal blog) and received a total of 280 entries.
So what’s the advantage of using one of these companies vs. just hiring an individual? Many options. Through the power of an open contest you get many more options than you’d ever receive from a single individual, all at a price you can probably afford.
So if you need to get a logo going soon, I recommend one of these companies. I’ll probably use one soon to do a logo for our church.
If you do have a logo, how did you go about getting it? What was your experience like?

Releasing an Army of Volunteers

Have you seen those BestBuy commerials? The one where a guy/girl is standing in the middle of a stadium, asks a question, and thousands of BestBuy employees are there, ready to help with answers?
All I could say is wow.
The concept of what they’re doing is really simple. They’re releasing many of their employees to be available on twitter to answer questions that you might have.
Why is this important?
Firstly, what a great way to leverage technology. This is way better than just going to one store and asking an employee for his opinion. In theory, you could have quite a few eyeballs on your question and quite a few responses.
Secondly, this must create an incredible sense of momentum and warm-fuzzy-vibes (couldn’t think of a more technical term) for the employees. They’re being released to help people. They’re making a contribution. And nobody is paying them extra for it. What a beautiful recipe for making a difference.
Not only that, but a company that is willing to make their people “available” like that to help is going to engender a greater amount of trust, loyalty, and good will from the customer.
This is the same exact principle that we try to do as churches. Releasing every single person to be missionaries and to minister. This is easier said than done, though.
I wonder how we could release our people in a similar way to serve and minister, all while leverage a similar use of technology?

[image by ShockandAwe]
In case you haven’t seen the commercial, here it is below.

Role Reversal in Church and Technology


I had the privilege to guest post recently on John Saddington’s blog (churchcrunch.com) on the topic of how the church used to be the leader in developing and implementing technology, and how the porn industry has taken its mantle.

Here’s a quote from the beginning:

I recently came back from a trip to Europe where I had the opportunity to visit several cities including Rome, one of the great epicenters of church history. As I toured the beauties of the Vatican and surrounding areas, I was struck with a thought: the greatest minds in the world were focused on making church an awesome place to be.

To read it in it’s entirety you can click here. I’d love to get your thoughts on what you think can be done to reverse this trend.

Creating Excitement in a Church Service

Want to create some excitement in a church service? Do something really different. Perhaps something you’ve never done before. So what’s something we (leaders) never do in a church service? We never ask people to pull out their cell phones and actually turn them on!

This past weekend we kicked of a brand new sermon series for Easter called “He Still Moves Stones.” And as an opening illustration we did an interactive social experiment where we asked people to pull our their cell phones, and to vote live on what their greatest struggle is.
Here’s a picture of what they voted on:
They would vote by sending a text message to whatever struggle they were dealing with the most. And how did they react? It was electric. It just took about 2 minutes, but it was a lot of fun for me (and for them) seeing the numbers change live. After all was said and done, this ended up being the final tally. And I told them that these would be the four topics we’d be covering for the next four weeks, so people already had an interest in learning more, since these were things that they voted on as being significant struggles in their life.
You can’t do do something like this every week, but the reaction and the interest it created in the series was priceless. To learn more about using this feature go to www.polleverywhere.com
What about you? Have you tried something that has helped to create some excitement in a church service? What about the opposite? Have you tried something and found it to suck the air out of the room in an awkward experiment gone bad?

Sound Like Something You’ve Heard Before?

Does this remind anyone of that Scripture from Daniel 12:4? “…many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase…”

Leadership, Small Groups, and Coaching: You Asked For It!


Today I’m beginning a new feature I announced a few weeks ago called “You Asked For It!” where I do my best to try to answer a question that you’ve submitted on the blog through the Skribit tool. To see the original post where I announced some ideas for Skribit click here

There are two questions and I’m going to answer both of them in this post.
Here’s the first question:
“How leadership will change technology and vice-versa.”
Here’s what I think: principles never change, but methods always do. In this case technology is the changing method, but the principles behind leadership will never change. I think what technology does is increase the reach of what you’re doing. Decades ago, the early adopters of technology began using radio as the means to reach more people. Instead of speaking to hundreds they could now communicate with hundreds of thousands. To quote someone I heard recently, “technology is soul-less.” It’s a thing. It’s an it. By itself it can’t do much. But in the hands of a wise leaders, it can increase his reach.
Now I’m  not making a political statement, but I believe Barack Obama was wise in how he used technology. With it, he was able to reach and speak directly to groups of people that may not have paid too much attention before. He would send out text and YouTube video messages. Their volunteers would invite you to join their Facebook pages. He spoke the language (principle) in a way that made people listen (method).
I’m no expert in the field, but I don’t think that leadership has changed that much throughout time. Leaders have always been those that have been able to describe reality as it is, give a picture of how the future could be, and then lead the people to get there. Those fundamentals have always and always will be there. So I don’t think that we should make technology the thing. The message and principle is always the thing, and should never be eclipsed by the use technology.
Here’s the second question:
“New ideas, resources about small groups, specifically Nelson Searcy’s view.”
For those of you that don’ t know, Nelson Searcy is the founding pastor of the Journey Church in New York City. He also does coaching through an organization called Church Leader Insights. His organization coaches senior pastors, worship leaders, church planters, and small group pastors through different live coaching events as well as through telephone coaching. If there’s more interest I can give some more information on the benefits of coaching, which I highly recommend. I’m involved in his tele-coaching network for pastors and it has been a huge blessing.
Concerning small groups, there seem to be endless varieties. Nelson Searcy pioneers a semester-based free market group system. He has an excellent book on the subject called Activate. I highly recommend it and believe it to be one of the most thorough and helpful books on small groups I’ve ever read. Let me give you the gist of the system:
First of all, they are based upon a free market philosophy. That means that the groups can be of varied topics such as biblical finance, a group for men, or a running group. The only common denominator is that in every group there must be prayer and they must discuss biblical principles. So the biblical finance group might study through Dave Ramsey’s Financial Peace University materials. The men’s group might study Experiencing God. Or the running group might study some other book, and then go for a run together.
Secondly, they are semester-based. Each year is divided into three 8-12 week semesters. So there is a winter, spring, and summer semester. After every semester there is a one month break. So there is three months on and one month off. The month off, called a promotion month, serves several purposes. For one, it gives the leaders and attenders a break. Nelson Searcy calls this the “stress and release” principle. During that month off they also heavily promote the next series of small groups and encourage people to sign up. 
So if I went to church on a typical promotion month, I would have a list in the church bulletin of the upcoming groups, and I could check off which group I wanted to join. There would also be group leaders in the lobby that I could speak to and get more information from or I’d be able to sign up on the church website.
In my opinion, this seems to be the superior model out there. I did cell groups for almost three years, and it completely wore out my leaders. This system is decentralized like a cell group, but it has the added advantage that it can reach and minister to a greater spectrum of people. In fact, within the Seventh-day Adventist church, there was a pastor (Dave Livermore) that was using a very similar method of semester-based small groups, and experienced very good growth. His was one of the fastest growing Adventist churches in North America. 
Concerning resources  for small groups Nelson Searcy offers the book, Activate, as well as various recorded workshops that can be purchased from the Church Leader Insights website.
I hope that answers your questions. If not let me know and I can get you more information. Remember to use the Skribit tool on the blog to add questions you’d like to see addressed in a future post of You Asked For It!
So what do you think? How do you think technology will change leadership, and what are some systems of small groups that you’ve used and can recommend?

Twitter For Churches and Non-Profits?

Have you heard of Twitter? If you’re into technology at all chances are you have heard of Twitter, and maybe you’ve even been using it. For those that haven’t heard of it, Twitter is a “free social networking and micro-blogging service that allows its users to send and read each other’s updates (otherwise known as tweets).”

If you’re into Facebook, it’s similar to the Facebook status updates.
Twitter just got some new competition through a new app called Yammer. Yammer bills itself as the Twitter for business people. Being able to stay in constant contact by answering the question, “what are you working on?”
Here’s my question, though?
Has anyone figured out a way to use Twitter or Yammer for churches or non-profits? What are some practical ways that you’ve been blessed and made more effective through using these apps? How do you see this changing the way you do business as usual?
I’m still trying to figure out if this is something worth jumping into.
Page 11 of 11« First...«7891011