Archive - February, 2009

7 Days of Servolution

I just got word of this myself and wanted to pass it along to those that are subscribed. It’s been shown time and time again that servant evangelism is one of the best ways to reach people. Well, a new website has been setup to serve as a hub for doing servant evangelism. Specifically, this is a joint effort between partnering churches across the nation to use the 7 days leading up to easter to do servant evangelism projects.

So visit www.servolution.org to register your church, ministry, or group (it’s free). You will be given access to printed materials like posters and fliers, web graphics, promotion plans and other resources. And it’s all free.
So what will you do? Were you already planning on doing some servant evangelism before easter? If you are doing something, be sure to let us know here so we can learn together about it.

Why Do People Leave Church?

I’ll admit it. People have left my church. Attendance has been down a little lately. That’s why I was interested in a talk that Nelson Searcy gave recently at a coaching event describing why some people leave church.

He mentioned that one of the major reasons why people leave the church is because of sin in their life. Most people don’t mention this when they leave, of course. If asked, they will usually speak about superficial things like music or the children’s ministry. But they leave because he says, “it’s impossible for people to live too long without congruence between belief and behavior.”

For example, there may be someone that is struggling with a sin that they have overcome, but later on fall back into. For many, this lack of congruence between their belief and behavior causes them to split.

So what suggestions does he offer?

We need to teach that we’re churches of grace. We need to be “welcome back” churches. When we haven’t seen someone for awhile, instead of making them feel bad for not having been there, we need to welcome them back like the father of the prodigal son.

So how good are you at noticing people that have left and welcoming them back when they arrive?

I have to admit that with two churches, I often can’t even tell if someone hasn’t been there! Sometimes I may go a month or two before noticing and remembering that I haven’t seen someone in a while. So I do my best to try to remember, and give those that I haven’t seen a call or a note.
There was a family that I hadn’t seen in a year and a half. They attended for about 6 months, and then fell off the side of the earth. I never saw them again. I would call, and leave messages. I wanted to see them, but, it seems, they did not want to be seen. Finally one day I caught them on the phone and I told them I wanted to see them because I missed them. When I stepped into their home and, after speaking to them for a little while, I could tell that they had fallen back into some sins that they were not proud of. To make matters worse, their house had gone into foreclosure, and they were now living somewhere else. Emotionally, they felt defeated, and in the words of the wife, “would not be of any good to anyone at church.” It really pained me to hear her say that because it means that I had not made it clear enough that the church is a hospital for people that are sick and messed up. So I took a moment to pour out my soul and give them the true picture of what a church really is–a bunch of messed up people that are on a journey together, following Christ.
Hopefully when they do show back up, we can surround them, celebrate with a hug, and welcome them back as if they’ve never been gone.

What about you? What have you noticed about why people are leaving churches? What are you doing to follow up with those that have left? How are you welcoming them back?

Free e-Book on Leadership


In case you haven’t heard, the Exponential Network has just released a free ebook called Leadership Learnings From Bloggers. It features over 250 pages of leadership lessons from over 20 national bloggers including Perry Noble, Seth Godin, Craig Groeschel, and others.

You can download the ebook by clicking here.
Happy reading and learning!

How Do You Make Decisions?


How does it happen where you work? What is the filter that you use to determine if a decision is the right one or not. Here’s a great quote that exemplifies a great filter for making decisions. It’s taken from the book Made to Stick (p. 29):

Herb Kelleher [the longest-serving CEO of Southwest] once told someone, “I can teach you the secret to running this airline in thirty seconds. This is it: We are THE low-fare airline. Once you understand that fact, you can make any decision about this company’s future as well as I can.
“Here’s an example,” he said. “Tracy from marketing comes into your office. She says her surveys indicate that the passengers might enjoy a light entree on the Houston to Las Vegas flight. All we offer is peanuts, and she thinks a nice chicken Caesar salad would be popular. What do you say?”
The person stammered for a moment, so Kelleher responded: “You say, ‘Tracy, will adding chicken Caesar salad make us THE low-fare airline from Houston to Las Vegas? Because if it doesn’t help us become the unchallenged low-fare airline, we’re not serving any damn chicken salad.’”
I probably wouldn’t have used his language, but I think his response offers some powerful lessons on how to make decisions. For one, the CEO was clear about the core mission of the company. This allowed him to make concrete decisions easily and quickly. 
Many think, though, that simply having a mission statement will become that filter, but it’s not true. I thought that by adopting our current purpose statement (to lead our Carrollwood community to become fully devoted followers of Jesus Christ) my ails would subside, and everything would become crystal clear. It didn’t happen.
Here’s what I’ve learned since then.
As a church pastor, there are numerous questions that I could possibly have to deal with. Everyone of those possible projects and ministry opportunities could multiply my work load and stress. In our church, though, I’m attempting to move to a model of ministry that vastly eliminates difficult questions. Here’s the question- “will it bless and help the weekend worship servive, or will it bless and help the small group system?” If the answer is no, I don’t want to do it. If the answer is yes, I want to try it. 
This is based upon an administrative and small-group paradigm as presented in the book Activate. The book Simple Church was a huge step forward in helping churches align their method to their mission. So in a typical “Simple Church” they would have a purpose statement like “Love God, Love People, Serve the World.” Loving God would correlate with the weekend worship service. Loving people would connect people to small groups. And serving the world would usher people to get connected to a service ministry. This sounds pretty simple, but it basically just makes a church reshuffle it’s ministries to point to a particular area of purpose. I believe the Activate method is better and is much more simple. In this paradigm a church only does two things: a weekend worship service and small groups. Any ministries are run through the small group system.
I’m not there yet, but I look forward to the day when my decision making process has been made exponentially more simple.
What about you? What filter do you use for making decisions? How has it worked? Where are you trying to go?

What Level of Communicator Are You?

I attended a live coaching event recently with Nelson Searcy and Roy Mansfield (small group pastor at NorthStar Church), and I’d like to share over the next few posts a few of the key nuggets.
Nelson Searcy said something that really bothered me in one of the talks: “The number of people that you’re currently speaking to may be proportional to the level of communicator that you are.” In other words, what level of communicator are you? Are you a 50 person speaker? Or are you a 20,000 person speaker. In my mind, I’m a 1,000 person speaker, but according to this metric, right now I’m just about a 90 person speaker. This hurts me because I’ve always thought of myself as a better speaker. But I think there’s truth to that statement. After all do we get invited to speak before very large crowds? There’s probably a reason for that. 
I was reminded that any athlete after a game will always watch the game tape. Why? They want to review their performance. They want to analyze how they did and how they can improve. And yet how often do we as speaker and leaders go back and watch the “game tape.” I admit that I rarely do.
Later that afternoon I was dialoguing with several other participants, and we began sharing ideas and different resources concerning how we can become better communicators. A popular resource that was shared was Preaching for Life Change by Rick Warren. The other is the book Communicating for a Change by Andy Stanley. 
I downloaded the Rick Warren resource and began listening to it, and immediately recognized the reason why he speaks to about 20,000 people a week. He said that it’s always been one of his goals to be a master communicator/preacher. Just on the subject of preaching he has over 350 books, which is more books than most seminaries have on the topic of preaching. It’s something that he’s always seeking to improve and become better at.
So I think I will be spending some more time watching the “game tape” from now on. After all, this game is sort of important.
How about you? How would you rate yourself as a speaker? What are some resources that you recommend? How have you become a better speaker?

Leadership, Small Groups, and Coaching: You Asked For It!


Today I’m beginning a new feature I announced a few weeks ago called “You Asked For It!” where I do my best to try to answer a question that you’ve submitted on the blog through the Skribit tool. To see the original post where I announced some ideas for Skribit click here

There are two questions and I’m going to answer both of them in this post.
Here’s the first question:
“How leadership will change technology and vice-versa.”
Here’s what I think: principles never change, but methods always do. In this case technology is the changing method, but the principles behind leadership will never change. I think what technology does is increase the reach of what you’re doing. Decades ago, the early adopters of technology began using radio as the means to reach more people. Instead of speaking to hundreds they could now communicate with hundreds of thousands. To quote someone I heard recently, “technology is soul-less.” It’s a thing. It’s an it. By itself it can’t do much. But in the hands of a wise leaders, it can increase his reach.
Now I’m  not making a political statement, but I believe Barack Obama was wise in how he used technology. With it, he was able to reach and speak directly to groups of people that may not have paid too much attention before. He would send out text and YouTube video messages. Their volunteers would invite you to join their Facebook pages. He spoke the language (principle) in a way that made people listen (method).
I’m no expert in the field, but I don’t think that leadership has changed that much throughout time. Leaders have always been those that have been able to describe reality as it is, give a picture of how the future could be, and then lead the people to get there. Those fundamentals have always and always will be there. So I don’t think that we should make technology the thing. The message and principle is always the thing, and should never be eclipsed by the use technology.
Here’s the second question:
“New ideas, resources about small groups, specifically Nelson Searcy’s view.”
For those of you that don’ t know, Nelson Searcy is the founding pastor of the Journey Church in New York City. He also does coaching through an organization called Church Leader Insights. His organization coaches senior pastors, worship leaders, church planters, and small group pastors through different live coaching events as well as through telephone coaching. If there’s more interest I can give some more information on the benefits of coaching, which I highly recommend. I’m involved in his tele-coaching network for pastors and it has been a huge blessing.
Concerning small groups, there seem to be endless varieties. Nelson Searcy pioneers a semester-based free market group system. He has an excellent book on the subject called Activate. I highly recommend it and believe it to be one of the most thorough and helpful books on small groups I’ve ever read. Let me give you the gist of the system:
First of all, they are based upon a free market philosophy. That means that the groups can be of varied topics such as biblical finance, a group for men, or a running group. The only common denominator is that in every group there must be prayer and they must discuss biblical principles. So the biblical finance group might study through Dave Ramsey’s Financial Peace University materials. The men’s group might study Experiencing God. Or the running group might study some other book, and then go for a run together.
Secondly, they are semester-based. Each year is divided into three 8-12 week semesters. So there is a winter, spring, and summer semester. After every semester there is a one month break. So there is three months on and one month off. The month off, called a promotion month, serves several purposes. For one, it gives the leaders and attenders a break. Nelson Searcy calls this the “stress and release” principle. During that month off they also heavily promote the next series of small groups and encourage people to sign up. 
So if I went to church on a typical promotion month, I would have a list in the church bulletin of the upcoming groups, and I could check off which group I wanted to join. There would also be group leaders in the lobby that I could speak to and get more information from or I’d be able to sign up on the church website.
In my opinion, this seems to be the superior model out there. I did cell groups for almost three years, and it completely wore out my leaders. This system is decentralized like a cell group, but it has the added advantage that it can reach and minister to a greater spectrum of people. In fact, within the Seventh-day Adventist church, there was a pastor (Dave Livermore) that was using a very similar method of semester-based small groups, and experienced very good growth. His was one of the fastest growing Adventist churches in North America. 
Concerning resources  for small groups Nelson Searcy offers the book, Activate, as well as various recorded workshops that can be purchased from the Church Leader Insights website.
I hope that answers your questions. If not let me know and I can get you more information. Remember to use the Skribit tool on the blog to add questions you’d like to see addressed in a future post of You Asked For It!
So what do you think? How do you think technology will change leadership, and what are some systems of small groups that you’ve used and can recommend?

From Church Bored to Full Boar

Do you or your members find being on church board a boring experience? Or perhaps, as a leader, you have found church board to be a bottleneck of bureaucracy? 

If the pastor, or any one leader, is leading a church board and is (by design or default) the primary decision-maker and evaluator of all the ministries of the church, then the church becomes too pastor-dependent. In other cases, perhaps without strong central leadership, some churches develop many ministries that fragment the limited time and resources of too few members. Just because the church manual has a “slot” for a certain ministry, does not mean every church everywhere HAS to do that ministry. Church members become busy, but the overall mission of the church is not coordinated. My philosophy is that I would rather do less, but do it very well.
Since I entered ministry, I have found the week to week and month to month challenges of administration and leadership to be an on-the-job learning experience! And while praying for the Holy Spirit, living true to Christ’s example, and even preaching powerful, Biblical sermons is vital, it is not enough to sustain the growth of the Kingdom of God in our churches. Take for example Jesus’ comment about wine and wineskins. New wine requires new wineskins. Fresh spirituality and empowerment needs functional and effective church structures to keep alive. 
One of my churches is currently brainstorming a new way to organize itself for more fruitfulness. We have simply defined our mission around three core priorities: love God (worship), love each other (fellowship), and serve our community (outreach). We want everything we do to be held to at least one of these core purposes. And furthermore, being a smaller church with busy families, we realize there is only energy and talent to do one or two major things in each of these areas.
Our idea is to form three ministry leadership teams around each of these three areas. We will shorten our board meeting time, and then allow each of these ministry leadership teams to meet simultaneously. We did not want to have three different teams meeting at all different times, because then communication, consistency, and burnout (for church-workaholics) will become a problem. This way, instead of one board under one person’s leadership trying to do everything, we make room for people to discover a specific area of passion and work together on a team for that area. There are no extra layers of administration required, just a different structure that decentralizes ministry planning and evaluation. As pastor, I work closely with the leaders and co-leaders of each ministry leadership team, but even I can’t be on all of them!
We hope this strategy will unleash the team-work model of local church leadership that the early church experienced (Ephesians 4). What do you think? 
Page 1 of 212»